Sutton's Dry Plates, Ute Pottery, and My Print Stamp

SUTTON’S DRY PLATE TEST
I manage to expose two of the four dry plates I prepared. The results weren’t great, but a stepping stone toward making the plates work. I think I know what the problem is; Sutton talks about the importance of bromide in the process. He compares it to the Daguerreotype. I need to revisit the proportion of bromides in the collodion. There should be an equal amount of iodides and bromides. I learned some really valuable things. I feel like the failures are important in these processes, that’s how you really get to know them.

Plate #1 - f/11 for 15 seconds. Sutton’s Rapid Dry Plate process.

Plate #1 - Very thin, barely a positive. But it did work! Sutton’s Rapid Dry Plate process.

In short, I basically made dry plate positives. Weak positives at that. It’s a sensitivity issue for sure. I exposed the first plate (Plate #1) at f/11 for 15 seconds, trying to match what a wet collodion plate would require. After developing the first plate, I was curious if it was the exposure time or the chemistry, I opened up the aperture to f/5.6 and gave 20 seconds to the second plate (Plate #2).

I’ll go back and make some new collodion with the bromides and iodides perfectly balanced. Everything else seemed to work fine. I see a lot of potential in this process. It does, in fact, LOOK like wet collodion, which I want. I’m not that excited by some of the processes that look like film. I would just shoot sheet film if I wanted that. I want that “look” that wet collodion gives and I think I can get it with this process or the Collodio-Albumen process. I really believe this will be a lot faster, in terms of exposure times, than any of the other dry plate processes (several minute exposures, this will be seconds, not minutes). I can see that already. As fast as wet collodion? Maybe not quite, but close.

Plate #2 - f/5.6 for 20 seconds. Sutton’s Rapid Dry Plate process.

Plate #2 - basically an underexposed positive plate. Sutton’s Rapid Dry Plate process.

MY PRINT STAMP
I’ll be offering (selling) prints from the work I do over the next year or so. I wanted to make these prints special not only with the process but with a signature and stamp. I don’t like to use anything on prints other than pencil and didn’t want an ink stamp. I ended up getting this stamp made from a guy on Etsy. I think it looks very good and will make my prints forever mine!

My new print stamp. Looks great!

My new print stamp. Looks great!

UTE POTTERY BY L. POSEY
I purchased this pot made by a Ute artist named L. Posey. This is a special piece for me because I will use it for the project this year. It will hold the special plants of the area that I will photograph. Things like Bear Root, Yucca, and many other plants and vegetation. The colors and design will look amazing in a print.

Ute pottery by L. Posey

Ute pottery by L. Posey - bottom of the bowl - signed and authenticated,

The First Collodio-Albumen Negative: Success!

This has been an incredible journey. I first read about Albumen on Glass (dry plate negative) 15 years ago and even gave it a try. The exposures were ridiculously long, so I stayed with the Wet Collodion process. I didn’t care too much for the Dry Collodion negatives. They looked too much like silver gelatin film to me. Nothing wrong with that, it just wasn’t the aesthetic I wanted. So years later, I’m still at it. Trying to find a dry process that will give the negatives I want for Platinum Palladium printing. And I think I may have found that process.

I don’t know anyone who’s made Collodio-Albumen Negatives. I’m not even sure when the last one was made. It’s probably been 160 years or so. This process fell out of fashion when other dry plate methods became easier and more dependable. I’m not sure though, maybe someone out there has made perfect Collodio-Albumen Negatives for years. I doubt it, but who knows.

This is one of four Half Plates I exposed today. I only processed this one because I’m out of DH2O and didn’t have my fresh pyrogallic acid with me in the darkroom. I used tap water to develop this negative and very old pyrogallic acid. I can’t believe how well it worked. I do have a chemical burn on the plate. A small grain of undissolved silver or pyro hit the plate and made that little gremlin. The water was very cold too. It’s not important, the important bit is that it works and works well. I’ll gear up and go for some Whole Plate negatives now. I will process the other negatives too.

A Half Plate Collodio-Albumen Negative sitting on my light tablet. This was a six minute exposure at f/16.

A Half Plate Collodio-Albumen Negative sitting on my light tablet. This was a six minute exposure at f/16. Image is inverted.

The original scene. I guess I could’ve picked better light, but I was excited to test the process!

My Chamonix 10x10 camera and a Dallmeyer 3B lens stopped down to f/16.

You can see my bellows extension here. Not too bad - this plate was six (6) minutes at f/16. I’ll get my water and fresh chemistry squared away and let’s see what the other negatives look like - 5 minutes, 4 minutes, and 3 minute exposures.